Problem:
1. Scholars often avoid Anzaldúa's "politics of spirit" because, in academic settings, spiritual topics are seen as outdated and face prejudice. Scholars are trained to rely on rational, logical reasoning and evidence-based thinking. Even those who want to write about this subject fear harming their careers or being condemned. Avoidance seems like "common sense" because spirituality and activism are viewed as opposites. This limited thinking causes many to dismiss this view as irrational. Even Western academic values categorize spirituality as unscientific or superstitious. Need Assignment Help?
2. One reason for the marginalization of spirituality as a universal life force is that such beliefs are often seen as unserious, or even as "politically regressive essentialism" (Keating 54). This causes scholars to avoid engaging with these ideas for fear of negative backlash. These beliefs are further marginalized because they don't fit into Western ideologies, dominant religions, or traditions. Since they are considered "primitive," they are rejected.
3. To "re-member" the past means to engage with history, to gain wisdom from previous systems of belief and adapt them to contemporary scenarios. This doesn't mean reviving old rituals, but learning from them. Examples include boycotts or hunger strikes that were successful in history and are now being used in places like detention centers to call for reform and change. reply back to kassandra statement in 150 words