Safiol had a contract to purchase a lot from sechrest he


Question: Safiol had a contract to purchase a lot from Sechrest. He wanted to build a house on the lot and gave Sechrest a deposit of $3,800. The contract was contingent on Safiol's obtaining all permits and other approvals necessary to build a residence. Safiol hired an architect to draw up plans and discussed the matter with the town but never submitted an application for a building permit. Safiol advised Sechrest that he was terminating the contract because he had never received the necessary permits and demanded the return of his deposit. Is he entitled to get his deposit back? (Sechrest v. Safiol, 419 N.E.2d 1384 Mass.)

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Management Theories: Safiol had a contract to purchase a lot from sechrest he
Reference No:- TGS02290078

Expected delivery within 24 Hours