Rundles, Kreiger, and Larson formed a partnership to breed and show horses. Rundles and Kreiger each contributed $25,000 to the partnership. Larson contributed four (4) horses valued at $25,000. The partnership agreement provided that the partners would share profits equally. When the horses failed to perform as expected, Rundles and Kreiger decided to reduce Larson's share of the profits. Larson claims that this decision must be unanimous to be binding. How will the case be decided? What could they have done to avoid this problem?