Assignment:
Question 1. Demonstrate your understanding of these terms by using them correctly in a paragraph you create. Creativity is encouraged, but not required; a realistic scenario would be best. Do not simply provide a definition for the terms. Terms: harassment, severe, pervasive, vicarious liability, affirmative defense, and remedy.
Your answer must be at least 150 words in length. You must use at least your textbook to complete this assignment. All sources used, including the textbook, must be referenced; paraphrased and quoted material must have accompanying citations. All references and citations used must be in APA style.
Question 2. Demonstrate your understanding of these terms by using them correctly in a paragraph you create. Creativity is encouraged, but not required; a realistic scenario would be best. Do not simply provide a definition for the terms. Terms: narrowly tailored, consent decree, reverse discrimination, strict scrutiny, reasonable basis, underutilization.
Your answer must be at least 150 words in length. You must use at least your textbook to complete this assignment. All sources used, including the textbook, must be referenced; paraphrased and quoted material must have accompanying citations. All references and citations used must be in APA style.
Question 3. Read “Skaggs v Kroger:" Can the employee sue the employer for negligence, or is workers’ compensation his exclusive remedy?
Your answer must be at least 150 words in length.
Question 4. Explain the interplay between Section 7 and Section 8 rights in National Labor Relations Act . Also, provide an example of workplace activity (or a workplace scenario) that would help illustrate the interplay between the two sections.
Your answer must be at least 150 words in length. You must use at least your textbook to complete this assignment. All sources used, including the textbook, must be referenced; paraphrased and quoted material must have accompanying citations. All references and citations used must be in APA style.