Right to procedural due process


Assignment:

Miss Horowitz was admitted as an advanced medical student at the University of Missouri–Kansas City. During the spring of her first year, several faculty members expressed dissatisfaction with Miss Horowitz’s clinical performance, noting that it was below that of her peers, that she was erratic in attendance at her clinical sessions, and that she lacked a critical concern for personal hygiene. Upon the recommendation of the school’s Council on Evaluation, she was advanced to her second and final year on a probationary basis. After subsequent unfavorable reviews during her second year and a negative evaluation of her performance by seven practicing physicians, the council recommended that Miss Horowitz be dismissed from the school for her failure to meet academic standards. The decision was approved by the dean and later affirmed by the provost after an appeal by Miss Horowitz. She brought suit against the school’s Board of Curators, claiming that her dismissal violated her right to procedural due process under the Fourteenth Amendment and deprived her of ‘‘liberty’’ by substantially impairing her opportunities to continue her medical education or return to employment in a medically related field. Is her claim correct? Explain.

Your answer must be, typed, double-spaced, Times New Roman font (size 12), one-inch margins on all sides, APA format and also include references.

Solution Preview :

Prepared by a verified Expert
Business Law and Ethics: Right to procedural due process
Reference No:- TGS01971489

Now Priced at $20 (50% Discount)

Recommended (97%)

Rated (4.9/5)