Richard Pawlus was an owner of Dutch City Wood Products, Inc., which did business as “Dutch City Marketing”. Pawlus purchased merchandise from Rothschild Sun systems from April 24 to June 24 using the designation “Richard Pawlus Dutch City Marketing” on orders and correspondence. In October, Rothschild was notified that Pawlus was acting on behalf of the corporation when the merchandise was purchased. Rothschild sued Pawlus for payment for the merchandise. Pawlus contended that he was an agent of the corporation and was thus not personally liable. Decide. Explain your answer.