Problem:
You are reviewing a manuscript that is methodologically sound and well-written, but its findings challenge assumptions you personally hold about leadership effectiveness. The study does not violate ethical standards, but it conflicts with your own theoretical commitments. You feel uneasy recommending publication based on your personal misgivings. No one would be hurt by the study. Which considerations are appropriate in this peer-review situation? (Select all that apply.) Providing developmental feedback Blocking publication to protect the field from this radical idea (in your opinion). Assessing methodological rigor independently of conclusions Transparency only if moral or ethical concerns influence judgment, not philosophical or pedagogical. Evaluating contribution to the literature Recognizing reviewer authority and responsibility Distinguishing novelty from noise Allowing personal preference to guide the decision Rejecting the manuscript based on personal beliefs Separating personal disagreement from scholarly evaluation. Need Assignment Help?