Problem:
Remember all participation replies each topic week should be substantive with 250 words. If citing a source please demonstrate APA 7th edition.
To determine when my problem space is sufficiently narrowed to support a feasible study, I evaluate several key criteria drawn from established research guidelines. The topic should achieve a high level of specificity and focus, moving beyond broad explorations like management in esports to target a precise aspect, such as how classical management theories address coordination and resilience challenges in hybrid esports teams combining in person and remote players.
A strong indicator is the ability to articulate the research question clearly in one sentence, with well defined variables and constructs, such as leadership effectiveness and team resilience measured through win rates or player retention. Feasibility is another critical factor; the study must be realistic within 1 to 2 years, considering accessible data sources, my skills, and resources. For my topic, this means assessing whether I can recruit a manageable sample using affordable tools like Qualtrics for surveys or interviews, while ensuring ethical approvals remain straightforward and avoiding demands for proprietary data or extensive travel. Finally, the problem must align with a viable methodology yielding measurable outcomes, allowing me to outline a basic design without overwhelming complexity. When advisor feedback affirms the topic as doable and engaging, and a preliminary proposal flows coherently, the problem space is adequately narrowed.
Several questions remain as I work to refine the topic further without diluting its relevance. Geographically, should I restrict the study to North American esports communities to simplify access given my location in California, or include global hybrids, and how would I handle potential cultural differences in management application or resilience metrics? In terms of theories, which 2 to 3 classical principles should I prioritize, and how best to operationalize resilience via self reported surveys, objective indicators like team disbandment rates, or performance data? Questions also persist around the unit of analysis focusing primarily on the team level or drilling down to individual leaders/players and sampling strategies, including ethical recruitment from amateur versus professional scenes and incentives for participation. Defining hybrids precisely and isolating variables from confounders like game updates or sponsor influences are ongoing concerns. To resolve these, I plan targeted advisor consultations, a focused literature review on hybrid digital teams, and small pilot efforts like preliminary surveys.
For peers, I would offer tailored suggestions based on their proposed topics. If a topic feels overly broad, narrowing to a specific demographic like adolescent players in a single title such as Fortnite, combined with accessible online questionnaires, could enhance feasibility while emphasizing early ethics review for sensitive issues. For something like AI in game design with data access hurdles, focusing on open source games and simulation testing might help confirm practicality sooner. In general, piloting methods early often uncovers hidden challenges, and ensuring the scope matches available time, resources, and interest keeps the study both rigorous and achievable. Need Assignment Help?