Discussion:
Review the article: Laws should not constantly change by Matthew Bransgrove
Part 1
Having experienced a robust debate discussion regarding if these two laws should be flexible, it is time to shift gears a bit and consider the broader implications of changing laws from an ethical and philosophical perspective.
Read the article and Complete the following:
What is your initial perspective after reading the article?
Based on your review of the article, is there an ethical/philosophical consideration that supports/ challenges the article's considerations?
Part 2: Based on the first initial of your last name:
First initial M-Z: provide an argument 'FOR' there being an ethical/philosophical reasoning for changing laws.
First initial A-L: provide an argument 'AGAINST' there being an ethical/philosophical reasoning for changing laws.
In both considerations, provide research that supports your assertions.