Q. • How is design argument proposed as the best explanation for the universe's intricacy?
• How is theory of evolution a challenge to the design argument?
• How is Intelligent Design a response to the evolutionary explanation, and what are the evolutionary replies to this alternative?
• For Hume, why can't we conclude that, if parts of nature have causes, whole of nature is caused?
• Why think that the supposed order of the universe has to be modelled on human reason?
• How does our not having experienced the origin of universes undermine the design proponent's appeal to analogy (for example the principle that "like effects prove like causes")?
• How does Hume show that, using analogy, we cannot close that the creator of the universe is wise, one, incorporeal, good, or even still existing?