Assignment task:
I just need you to rewrite and use your own words.
1. Russian Empire statement
I disagree with the statement that the Russian Empire did little to change the lives of conquered peoples or the land itself. Chapter 13 explains that Russian expansion into Central Asia fundamentally transformed the region over time. Areas that had once been active crossroads of trade, religion, and cultural exchange became increasingly impoverished and marginalized under Russian rule. Nomadic pastoralists lost their traditional way of life as restrictions were placed on movement and grazing, forcing many into cities where poverty increased. Land ownership also shifted as local elites lost control, and economic activity declined as overland trade routes lost importance to oceanic trade (Strayer & Nelson, p. 572-573). These developments show that Russian rule deeply altered both society and land use, even if it did not aggressively assimilate local cultures. Need Assignment Help?
2. Qing Dynasty statement
I agree that the Qing Empire had several distinct features. Chapter 13 describes the Qing as a multiethnic empire that ruled conquered territories differently from core Chinese regions. Central Asia was governed separately through the Court of Colonial Affairs rather than the regular Chinese bureaucracy. The Qing relied on local elites-such as Mongol aristocrats, Muslim officials, and Buddhist leaders-to administer the region, showing a flexible approach to rule. Unlike other empires, the Qing did not push large-scale Chinese settlement or cultural assimilation, instead respecting local customs and religions while maintaining control through military power (Strayer & Nelson, p. 572-573). These governing strategies clearly set the Qing Empire apart.
3. Mughal Empire statement
I disagree with the statement that the Mughal Empire had few distinct features. Chapter 13 highlights the Mughal Empire's unique approach to religious diversity and governance. Under Akbar, the empire deliberately accommodated the Hindu majority by incorporating Hindus into the political and military elite, supporting both temples and mosques, and allowing religious freedom. This policy helped stabilize a diverse society. Later, Aurangzeb reversed this approach by enforcing Islamic law more strictly, reimposing the jizya tax, and limiting religious practices, which created unrest and resistance among Hindu populations (Strayer & Nelson, p. 573-575). These contrasting policies show that the Mughal Empire had clearly defined and evolving characteristics.
4. Ottoman Empire statement
I strongly disagree that the Ottoman Empire was a minor or insignificant empire. Chapter 13 shows that the Ottomans were one of the most powerful and influential empires of the early modern world. They controlled vast territory across Anatolia, southeastern Europe, the Middle East, and North Africa. The Ottomans developed a complex system of governing religious diversity, granting autonomy to Christian and Jewish communities while maintaining Muslim political dominance. The devshirme system allowed the state to recruit and train elite administrators and soldiers, strengthening central authority. The empire also held major religious significance by controlling Islamic holy cities and serving as a leading Sunni power (Strayer & Nelson, p. 575-577). These factors demonstrate that the Ottoman Empire was a major global force.