Problem: Reply in at least 100 words and disagree and make it funny:
I think that an area called Armand Bay in Houston Texas is significant to understanding environmental history for its area. I think it is significant because its is the leading region for wetland wildlife. In recent times, people have cultivated and industrialized almost everything. A lot of the once wild life areas are now overseen by humans. People protect these wild life areas, but they will never be the same as they once were without human intervention. In Shrinking the Earth, Donald Worster explores how the land has gone form a society of natural abundance to once concerned with the limits to growth and consequences of limits to the American way of life. I see this greatly in Armand Bay because now our worries are keeping species alive and maintaining a natural ecosystem. The human intervention of adding pollution to the air and water, budling houses and boats, and adding the human species into the mix has altered the original environment. When a new environment that is full of nature and potential is found, people in history have taken it over and made it like a "second earth." Because the land had yet to be tampered with, human kind sought it as desirable to subside in. Places with beautiful lakes, trees, and animals. In chapter 1, Worster contends that the discovery of so much space, land, soil, forests, minerals, and water dramatically influenced the material foundations of life in the old world. As the material conditions evolved, they consequently transformed European and North American societies' economies, ecologies, perceptions, values, institutions, and behaviors. This is how many of our societies have come to be. In order to build up our societies, we took down already existing societies and harmed the ecosystem in return. In Chapter 2, Worster understand this as he explores various "revolutions" linked to this discovery, specifically the scientific, industrial, and commercial revolutions. Need Assignment Help?