Preponderance of the evidence clear and convincing evidence


The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) makes it illegal for US citizens to bribe high ranking foreign officials to get new business. A violation can have a criminal penalty that involves up to five years in prison.

If Phil were to be found to be in violation of the FCPA, what standard of proof would be needed for a criminal conviction?

Preponderance of the evidence. Clear and convincing evidence. Proof beyond a reasonable doubt. Proof beyond all doubt.

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Business Law and Ethics: Preponderance of the evidence clear and convincing evidence
Reference No:- TGS02618716

Expected delivery within 24 Hours