Prepare a paper that summarizes the steinkuhler et al study


Prepare a paper that summarizes the Steinkuhler et. al. study and its findings. Include an explanation of the following phenomena described in the article: self-justification, selective perception, sunk cost effect, and over-optimism. Then, select one of these four phenomena and describe its applicability to a real management decision that you have encountered or that you find through additional research. The management decision selected must have an international dimension. In what ways does this decision affect the overall health of the organization, both locally and globally? If the decision led to poor results, what would you recommend for future decisions and why?

Support your paper with a minimum of three scholarly resources. In addition to these specified resources, other appropriate scholarly resources, including older articles, may be included.

Length: 7 pages, not including title and reference pages.

Solution Preview :

Prepared by a verified Expert
Management Theories: Prepare a paper that summarizes the steinkuhler et al study
Reference No:- TGS01216325

Now Priced at $50 (50% Discount)

Recommended (93%)

Rated (4.5/5)

A

Anonymous user

2/29/2016 12:47:56 AM

By using a minimum of 3 to 4 academic resources or older articles, write a paper in approximately 7 pages (comprising title and reference pages) which mainly focus on summarizing a case study. Please write a paper which sum up the Steinkuehler et. al. study and its findings. Comprise a description of the given phenomena illustrated in the article: self-justification, choosy perception, sunk cost effect and over-optimism. Then, choose one of such four phenomena and illustrated its applicability to a real management decision which you have encountered or that you find via additional research. The management decision chosen must encompass an international dimension. In what manners does this decision influence the total health of the organization, both locally and globally? If the decision led to meager results, what would you propose for future decisions and illustrate why?