Poor sarah jane not only had a short-lived marriage but


Question: Poor Sarah Jane not only had a short-lived marriage but found out that her supposedly $45,000 ring was worth only half that amount. It seems that the jeweler had misrepresented to her now ex-husband. Sarah Jane now brings an action against the jeweler for breach of an express warranty. Can she sue even though she was not the purchaser or, in fact, any purchaser?

Solution Preview :

Prepared by a verified Expert
Management Theories: Poor sarah jane not only had a short-lived marriage but
Reference No:- TGS02470930

Now Priced at $15 (50% Discount)

Recommended (98%)

Rated (4.3/5)