1. Nagel starts by considering some reasons to be ethical. One reason he proposes is that God commands it. Why won't this work as a reason to care about others, or to act in a way that treats others fairly? Nagel gives at least three reasons.
2. Another argument to do the right thing is the "how would you like it if someone did that to you" argument. How does this argument work, according to Nagel?
3. What are some reasons for thinking that ethics is not universal-not the same for everyone? What are the problems with this sort of relativism?
4. Pick one of the three above, and write critically about Nagel's argument-is he missing something? Is he combining two things that should be kept separate? What can be said against his argument?
Attachment:- xid-4777036_1.zip