Nemo purchased an iBook G4 laptop computer from Apple, Inc. Shortly after the one-year warranty expired, the laptop failed to work due to a weakness in the product manufacture. Nemo sued Apple, and argued that the laptop should have lasted “at least a couple of years,” which Nemo believed was a reasonable consumer expectation for a laptop’s lifespan. Nemo claimed that Apple’s descriptions of the laptop as “”durable,” “rugged,” “reliable,” and “high performance” were affirmative statements concerning the quality and performance of the laptop, and that Apple failed to meet them. How should the court rule in this case? Decide this case, and explain your answer in depth.