Question: Mitchell's family trust insured a commercial building it owned. The building was destroyed by fire, and during the investigation of the causes, the insurance company discovered certain misrepresentations in the application for the policy, including the age of the building, the use made of the building, and the existence of building code violations. It rescinded the policy and refused to pay for the damage. Was it correct in doing this? (Mitchell v. United National Insurance Co., 127 Cal. App. 4th 457)