Question: M, a member of the intelligence bureau of the Fanatical Republic of Quirkydom, defects to Country A. M discloses that Quirkydom had planned and financed several terrorist attacks inside Country A over the past 10 years, including the kidnapping and murder of the chief executive officer of the largest business firm in Country A. M's disclosures include original documents, tape recordings, and videotapes that contain incriminating statements made by the terrorists, members of Quirkydom's intelligence bureau, its prime minister, and several cabinet members. After the daughter of the deceased CEO demanded that Country A sue Quirkydom in the ICJ, Country A did so. Both Quirkydom and Country A have recognized the jurisdiction of the ICI to hear their international disputes. Is Quirkydom liable for the acts of these terrorists? How should the ICI rule? Discuss.