Problem: I looked over CrimeSolutions' "Programs at a Glance" section for my discussion post and chose two programs with varying evidence ratings: Expanded Early Pathways for Young Traumatized Children, which was rated "Effective," and Across Ages, which was rated "No Effects." By contrasting these two initiatives, it is easier to see how evidence-based assessments determine whether crime prevention initiatives truly produce the intended outcomes. Across Ages is an intergenerational mentoring program for at-risk adolescents aged nine to thirteen. The program connects adolescents with older adult mentors and incorporates life skills instruction, community service, and family activities. The program's purpose is to prevent substance use and other negative behaviors while also enhancing relationships and increasing school involvement. However, this program received a "No Effects" rating because evaluations revealed no statistically significant differences in outcomes such as alcohol use, marijuana use, school bonding, grades, or problem behaviors between program participants and those in the control group (CrimeSolutions, n.d.). Despite the program's excellent aims and structure, research findings did not indicate substantial increases in the desired outcomes. Reply back to my classmates with at least 200 words, no dashes, no semicolons, and include in text APA citation and APA reference. Need Assignment Help?