Jones testified that henry had performed the work


Henry contracted with James to do certain remodeling work on the building owned by James. James supplied all of the necessary specifications for the work. The contract price for doing the work was $80,000. After the work was completed, James was unhappy and asked another contractor, Jones, who fashioned himself an expert, to compare the completed work to the specifications that were originally supplied to Henry. At trial, Jones testified that Henry had performed the work improperly and that it would cost approximately $16,000 to correct the deficiencies in the work performed for James. If James refuses to pay any amount to Henry what recourse, if any, does Henry have against James?

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Finance Basics: Jones testified that henry had performed the work
Reference No:- TGS0617752

Expected delivery within 24 Hours