Is the current employment verification system fair to


Case- A Tale of Two Raids

Questions-

1. Is the current employment verification system fair to employers?

2. Was Swift & Company socially responsible in its hiring and verification practices? Could it have done more? Was it treated fairly by ICE?

3. Is the work authorizations audit a better enforcement tool than the worksite raid? What are the advantages and disadvantages of each?

4. Is the current verification system fair to job applicants and employees? Does it allow companies to exploit unauthorized workers?

5. Do you believe that unauthorized workers should have the same protections against discrimination, sexual harassment, and wage and hour violations as authorized workers?

6. Does current enforcement of workplace immigration rules invite disrespect for the law? Should the government step up enforcement? Should U.S. immigration policy be reformed? If so, how should it be changed?

Solution Preview :

Prepared by a verified Expert
HR Management: Is the current employment verification system fair to
Reference No:- TGS01175020

Now Priced at $40 (50% Discount)

Recommended (98%)

Rated (4.3/5)

A

Anonymous user

4/16/2016 7:48:10 AM

This kind of assignment that illustrate to Case study on A Tale of Two Raids Questions- 1. Is the current employment confirmation system fair to employers? 2. Was Swift & Company socially responsible in its hiring and verification practices? Could it have done more? Was it treated fairly by ICE? 3. Is the work authorizations audit a better enforcement tool than the worksite raid? What are the benefits and drawbacks of each? 4. Is the current verification system fair to job applicants and employees? Does it permit companies to exploit unauthorized workers? 5. Do you consider that unauthorized workers must have the similar protections against discrimination, sexual harassment, and wage and hour abuses as authorized workers?