Problem: Is prevention of disease always the best outcome? During COVID lockdowns, people were required to sacrifice many social goods to prevent infections. Was this fair? Is prevention of a disease always the most important outcome? Do you think it is justifiable to use (measurable) health arguments to override other outcomes such as trust and social benefits (neither of which are easy to measure)? Why or why not? Feel free to draw on your own experience or stories from the media. Relate to Understanding Utilitarianism topic. Need Assignment Help?