Discuss the below:
Executives in large corporations are ultimately rewarded if their companies do well, particularly as evidenced by rising stock prices. Consequently, should we let those who run corporations decide which level of negative side effects of their goods or services are "acceptable"?
Johnny Sport is a world-famous athlete. He is careful to avoid using any performance enhancing drugs that are banned by his sport's oversight organization. Is it ethical for Johnny to take a performance-enhancing drug that has not been banned? Why or why not?