Instead od acquiring the plant for 31864 assume that cherry


On 1 July 2010, Cherry Ltd acquired an item of plant for $31,864. On the same date, Cherry Ltd entered into a lease agreement with Hazel Ltd in relation to the asset. According to the lease agreement, Hazel Ltd agreed to pay $12,000 immediately, with a further two payments of $12,000 on 1 July 2011 and 1 July 2012.

AT 30 June 2013, the asset is to be returned to the leesor and its residual value is expected to be $6000. Hazel Ltd has agreed to guarantee the expected residual value at 30 June 2013. All insurance and maintenance costs are to be paid by Cherry Ltd and are expected to amount to $2000 p.a. The costs of preparing the lease agreement amounted to $360. The interest rate implicit in the lease is 9%. The lease is classified as a finance lease. Plant is depriciable on a straight line basis.

Required

A. Prepare a schedule of lease receipts for Cherry Ltd and the journal entries for the year ended 30 June 2011

B. Prepare a schedule of lease payments for Hazel Ltd and the journal entries for the year ended 30 June 2011.

C. Assume that Hazel Ltd guaranteed a residual value of only $4000. Prepare a lease schedule for both Cherry Ltd and Hazel Ltd.

D. Instead od acquiring the plant for $31,864, assume that Cherry Ltd manufactured the plant at a cost of $29,500 before entering into the lease agreement with Hazel Ltd. Prepare a schedule of lease receipts for Cherry Ltd and the journal entries for the year ended 30 June 2011.

E. Assume that Hazel Ltd manufactured the plant itself at a cost of $29500 and sold the plant to Cherry Ltd for $31864. Hzrl then leased it back under the original terms of the finance lease, wih Haze Ltd quranteeing a residual value of $4000. Prepare a lease schedule for both Cherry Ltd and Hazel Ltd for the year ended 30 June 2011.

Solution Preview :

Prepared by a verified Expert
Financial Accounting: Instead od acquiring the plant for 31864 assume that cherry
Reference No:- TGS0760666

Now Priced at $40 (50% Discount)

Recommended (94%)

Rated (4.6/5)