Problem
Some intelligence scholars have called for broadening the scope of intelligence studies, for example, to further include both critical and comparative approaches. In what ways can these areas of inquiry - critical and comparative intelligence studies - advance the field (i.e., intelligence scholarship)? What are examples of specific questions that critical and comparative intelligence research could address and what would the theoretical and practical benefits of such questions be? What additional research avenues - of any type - would be constructive in intelligence studies, and why?