In both cases the appellate court deferred an employees


Review the cases below and answer the questions:

Caley v. Gulfstream Aero. Corp., 428 F.3d 1359 (11th Cir. Ga. 2005)

https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-11th-circuit/1187903.html

Santos v. Gen. Dynamics Aviation Servs. Corp., 9984 So. 2d 658 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

https://caselaw.findlaw.com/fl-district-court-of-appeal/1345605.html

In both cases the appellate court deferred an employee's right to a jury trial until after completion of the employer's mandatory ADR complaint resolution process even though there was no apparent agreement to this by the employees.

In regard to consideration and whether a contract was actually formed, explain precisely why the courts ruled as they did and what might have happened to the employer/employee relationship if the decision had gone the other way in favor of the employees.

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Business Management: In both cases the appellate court deferred an employees
Reference No:- TGS02229345

Expected delivery within 24 Hours