Question: What are the relationships that various law-enforcement agencies at all levels have with law-enforcement policies, laws, strategies, and the US Constitution? Explain. What can you tell me about terry v Ohio (1968) stop and frisk case? How do national, state, and local agencies, implement law-enforcement policies and strategies while accounting for the requirements of the US Constitution and other laws? Explain. What changes to law-enforcement came about as a result of the US Supreme Court's decision in the terry versus Ohio case? What did law-enforcement have to do differently as a result of that decision? What are the practical and implications? When the US Supreme Court renders a decision that impacts the way, in which law enforcement agencies do their business, how did those agencies go about implementing the necessary changes to their policies and procedures? Explain.