1. The court here expresses concern that, if Dr. Milton were permitted to win, it would open a "Pandora's box," with "every corporate officer fired in the wake of a disagreement over an employer's business practices" a potential successful plaintiff. Reframe this argument. What is at stake here for employers?
2. How can a firm use a cumulative expenditures curve--illustrating the firm's HISTORICAL pattern of product development costs--to guide/improve its future development efforts?