During world war II the government did a good job measuring nominal GDP. But if the price level was calculated incorrectly, we might get a completely wrong idea about what happened with real GDP. During world war II, price ceilings were in place. That means that some things that would've been expensive were artificially cheap instead. Within a few years of the wars end, price controls finally ended, and the price level spiked up about 20%. If the true price level during the war was actually 20% higher than reported, would that mean real GDP is higher than the official number reported in question 10b (states GDP growth to be 189%), lower than that number, or is it still the same as that number?