Question -
The exclusionary rule states the courts will exclude any evidence that was illegally obtained, even though it may be relevant and material. Why was the exclusionary rule enacted? Does it benefit or hurt society? Why or why not? Should there be exceptions? If so, what exceptions?
There are two types of warrants: a traditional search warrant that allows for searches of a particular location and a search warrant that allows for a search of records held by cloud providers. If appropriately obtained, what are the rules and limitations of a search warrant? In what situations is it constitutionally appropriate to search someone without a search warrant? What are some exceptions to warrantless searches? Can and should a warrantless search be stopped?