If a ratio increased from 2012 to 2013 why do you think


Question: Library Research Assignment

Locate a publicly traded U.S. company of your choice. Then, calculate the following ratios for the company for 2012 and 2013:

.Liquidity Ratios ?Current ratio [current assets / current liabilities]
-Quick ratio [(current assets - inventory) / current liabilities]

.Asset Turnover Ratios ?Collection period [accounts receivable / average daily sales]
-Inventory turnover [cost of goods sold / ending inventory]
-Fixed asset turnover [sales / net fixed assets]

.Financial Leverage Ratios ?Debt-to-asset ratio [total liabilities / total assets]
-Debt-to-equity ratio [total liabilities / total stockholders' equity]
-Times-interest-earned (TIE) ratio [EBIT / interest]

.Profitability Ratios ?Net profit margin [net income / sales]
-Return on assets (ROA) [net income / total assets]
-Return on equity (ROE) [net income / total stockholders' equity]

.Market-Based Ratios ?Price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio [stock price / earnings per share]
-Price-to-book (P/B) ratio [market value of common stock / total stockholders' equity]

You are now ready to interpret the ratios that you have calculated. If a ratio increased from 2012 to 2013, why do you think that it increased? Is it a good or bad sign that the ratio increased? Please explain.

If a ratio decreased from 2012 to 2013, why do you think that it decreased? Is it a good or bad sign that the ratio decreased? Please explain.

If a ratio was unchanged from 2012 to 2013, why do you think that it was unchanged? Is it a good or bad sign that the ratio was unchanged? Please explain

Solution Preview :

Prepared by a verified Expert
Financial Management: If a ratio increased from 2012 to 2013 why do you think
Reference No:- TGS01232978

Now Priced at $15 (50% Discount)

Recommended (96%)

Rated (4.8/5)