Identifying misleading information in an argument in the


Identifying Misleading Information in an Argument: In the past ten years, most forms of drug use have dropped significantly, especially among teens. Despite this, non-violet drug offenders accounted for 21.1 percent of the federal prison population. First time drug offenders serve, on average, a sentence three months longer than kidnappers, nine months longer than burglars, and thirty-three months longer than sex abusers. In 1992, the average cost of keeping an inmate in either state or federal prison was about $20,00 per prisoner per year. The United States has the highest incarceration rate in the world, with 455 prisoners per 100,000 population. It is maintaining these prisoner at great expense in an environment where they are unlikely to develop a socially constructive attitude. Perhaps it is time that we reconsider our attitudes toward those who choose to use drugs; failure to do so may cost society even more than it already has. Determine whether or not the argument uses any deceptive statistics. Give opinion on whether or not the argument is persuaded you. Explain why or why not. Determine the primary ways in which statistics or authority are used in your current position in developing persuasive arguments, and provide examples of such use.

Solution Preview :

Prepared by a verified Expert
Macroeconomics: Identifying misleading information in an argument in the
Reference No:- TGS01543367

Now Priced at $10 (50% Discount)

Recommended (95%)

Rated (4.7/5)