Identify the influence of empiricism on quantitative


Systematic Reviews: Searching and Analysis of the Literature

This Assignment expands upon the work you have been conducting for this week's Discussion.) you will conduct a search for literature on your selected practice problem. A Literature Review Matrix template will be used to identify gaps in the literature.

To prepare:

Consider the practice problem you addressed in this week's Discussion. (You may select a new issue if necessary, but it is not recommended): Practice problem chosen: Health literacy and self-care activities, self-efficacy, and health related outcome of patients with type 2 Diabetes.

Review the guidelines in the Literature Review Matrix, included in the Learning Resources.

Formulate a research question around your issue as indicated in Part I. Then

complete Part II of the Matrix, identifying the resources you will use, search terms and criteria, and Boolean search strings.

Using the Walden Library, locate 10 articles related to your research question. At least one article must be a systematic review.

All of the articles should be primary sources. NOTE: If appropriate, you may use the four articles you reviewed for this week's Discussion.

Actual Assignment:

Complete Part I and Part II of the Literature Review Matrix template.

Begin working on Part III.

Review Part III of the Literature Review Matrix and notice which middle range theories were used most frequently in the articles you reviewed.

Consider the appropriate use of the theoretical frameworks in each article.

Review the information on empiricism presented in Chapter 1 of Theoretical Basis for Nursing and Chapter 6 in The Practice of Nursing Research: Appraisal, Synthesis, and Generation of Evidence as you consider your response to Part IV.

Complete Part III of the Literature Review Matrix.

In your analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of the existing literature, note the appropriate use of the theoretical frameworks.

Complete Part IV addressing the influence of empiricism on quantitative methodology.

Literature Review Matrix

Part I: PICO Analysis of Research Topic

P: Patient or Population

I: Anticipated Intervention

C: Comparison group or Current standard

O: Outcome desired

 Source: Adapted from Elkins (2010)

Step 1: Frame your clinical question using the PICO method.

P:

I:

C:

O:

Part II: Search Strategy

Using the Walden Library and other appropriate databases, locate ten scholarly articles that pertain to a practice issue of interest to you and that is appropriate for an evidence-based practice project.

 Step 1: Identify the resources you will utilize, or utilized, to find articles that pertain to your topic

Electronic Databases

Research or Professional Organizations

Experts in the field to consult

Books, encyclopedias, handbooks

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Step 2: Identify search terms and criteria

Key words & phrases

Major authors

Inclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Step 3: Identify Boolean search strings

Part III: Analysis of Literature

Step 1: Summarize the ten (10) articles you select from your search efforts completing the table below.

Summary Table of Analyzed Articles (you may determine your own headings)

Citation

Conceptual Framework/ Theory

Main finding

Research method

Strengths of study

Weaknesses

Level of Evidence

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Step 2: Briefly summarize the history and purpose of your research question.

Step 3: Analysis of strengths and weaknesses of existing literature.

Strengths

Weaknesses

 

 

 

 

Step 4: What gap exists in the current literature? Explain.

Part IV: Identify the influence of empiricism on quantitative research methodology. Discuss its applicability to evidenced-based practice projects.

Solution Preview :

Prepared by a verified Expert
Dissertation: Identify the influence of empiricism on quantitative
Reference No:- TGS02472222

Now Priced at $10 (50% Discount)

Recommended (90%)

Rated (4.3/5)