Cirque du Soleil:
Calibri or Arial 11 font, single-spaced, margins (1”) on all sides, no covers or binders, just a plain cover sheet with your name. Unlimited exhibits, graphs and attachments as long as they are referred to directly in your text. Cover sheet, and attachments not counted in page limit.
Written Case Analysis – Grading Rubric
Assignment: Analyze one of the 4 cases discussed in Session 3. Submit a Written Case Analysis based on the instructions in the Course Syllabus. Your analysis will be evaluated along the following dimensions: (a) Identification and prioritization of the central strategic issues in the case (a) Use of facts from the case (no external research) to support your identification and prioritization (c) Professional quality (clarity, grammar, spelling) of written work.
Names:
Excellent Fair Poor
1) Your Identification and prioritization of the central strategic issues in the case was: Clear identification and prioritization of the main and the secondary themes in the case Reasonably good summary of the main themes, you missed a few, and you attempted some prioritization Spotty and inconsistent, you presented an incomplete picture of the central themes and the secondary themes with little or no prioritization
2) Your use of the facts of the case to support your identification and prioritization was: Meticulous use of facts from the case and persuasive arguments to support all the themes identified You made an attempt to support your analysis with facts from the case but your arguments were weak or incomplete Scant: you asserted themes and their importance without supporting facts from the case
3) The professional quality of your written work was :
Smooth, clear and persuasive writing style. Evidence of meticulous proofreading: no discernible errors in grammar and spelling Overall, reasonably clear writing style with a few confusing parts. A few errors in grammar and spelling Line of reasoning was often unclear and confusing. Several errors in grammar and spelling.