Assignment:
Literature Review Topic Identification Instructions:
Overview:
In this assignment, you will identify your topic for your own literature review, which must be chosen from the recommendations for future research section of a peer-reviewed and scholarly journal article published within the last 5 years (current year, plus 4 prior years). Your topic must be related to the health sciences and must be related to your chosen cognate. The journal article you select must contain these sections: Introduction, Review of Literature, Research Design & Methods, Results, and Summary, Discussion and Conclusions. It should have been published within the past 5 years (current year, plus 4 prior years) on your topic. Use this peer-reviewed journal article as 1 of your references.
Instructions:
1. State how your topic is related to the health sciences and how it is related to your chosen cognate. Need Assignment Help?
2. Discuss the gap (singular) in the literature that lends to the need for a future study.
3. Identify and critically analyze at least 2 ways in which the Literature Review lends itself to revealing a researchable (singular) in the literature and led to the formation of the research question (singular).
4. Provide 3 items of constructive and critical feedback as related to the content of the Literature Review portion of the journal article, explaining alternatives or improvements for those 3 items.
5. Finally, identify clearly your topic for your own literature review (and therefore potentially for your dissertation later in the program). Your topic must be chosen from the section on recommendations for future research or future directions in the peer-reviewed journal article you selected. Explain how your topic it is similar to and how it differs from the topic in the journal article you selected, why it is significant, and what gap (singular) in the literature you propose to potentially address in your dissertation.
Literature Review Topic Identification Resources:
The use of artificial intelligence tools to generate, compose, or outsource any portion of your written work is strictly prohibited. Submitting AI-produced or AI-assisted writing constitutes a violation of the academic integrity expectations for this doctoral course. All submissions must reflect your own original scholarly analysis and writing.
Write a 2-4page essay in current APA format and submit it as a formatted Word document. Your essay should be clear, have a logical flow, and be organized in headings per current APA format and per textbook readings.
For future assignments, you are expected to demonstrate progression by incorporating instructor feedback from all prior assignments in this course.
Format of assignment: Current APA edition.
A minimum of5 peer-reviewed journal sources are required in addition to the Galvan and Galvan course text and the Bible. Biblical integration must be present. You can have a separate section titled Biblical Integration or Biblical Perspective, or Biblical Worldview. Another method is to integrate biblical concepts in your writing throughout, without having a dedicated section for it. The latter is considered a good way to demonstrate biblical integration throughout your writing for this course.
Acceptable sources include peer-reviewed sources published within the last five years (current year, plus prior 4 years) and seminal works for the theoretical framework (which can be more than 5 years old). You may include older articles provided you also meet the minimum requirement for 5 peer-reviewed sources published within the past 5 years (current year plus prior 4 years). If you exclude older articles, you may miss important information.
Page and word counts do not include front matter and back matter.
For all assignments in this course, you are expected to demonstrate progression by incorporating instructor feedback from prior assignments in this course.
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
At this stage in your doctoral journey, and specifically for this course, do not use the following or any secondary sources in your reference list: systematic reviews, integrative reviews, scoping reviews, and meta-analyses. These are secondary sources, and citing them is essentially the same as citing a review of other studies, rather than the original research.
For your assignments, you must rely on primary, peer-reviewed research articles. Primary sources report original data, methods, and findings, and these are essential for developing the critical research skills needed at the doctoral level. You may read systematic reviews and other secondary sources to help you understand your topic more broadly. However, if you come across useful studies within those reviews, locate and cite the original (primary) research articles from the reference lists rather than citing the review itself.
At this stage in your doctoral journey, you are in the coursework phase. Coursework prepares you for the dissertation phase, but it is not a substitute for the work required once you begin your dissertation. When you enter the dissertation phase, you will follow the direction and expectations of your Dissertation Chair. For now, please complete all assignments according to the requirements of this course, knowing that dissertation-level guidance will come later from the Chair of your dissertation committee.