How would you controvert problematize or at the very nuance


Problem

Consider the following result counts from exact phrase searches on Google:

"Buddhism is a philosophy, not a religion" 3,680
"buddhism is a way of life not a religion" 11,380
"Buddhism is non-violent" 4,380
"Buddhism is a religion of peace" 48,000

If you were to debate with a person who espoused these views, how would you controvert, problematize, or at the very least nuance them on the basis of what we learned in the course? What in them can be considered to bear some scrutiny on the basis of historical evidence? What instead does not?

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Other Subject: How would you controvert problematize or at the very nuance
Reference No:- TGS03293622

Expected delivery within 24 Hours