Complete two parts of the report
1. Discuss the limitations of your analysis (What don't we know? What can't be known and why? What other information would we need for a better analysis?)
The reasoning as to why the defeat devices were approved
If it allowed less pollutions during testing, why isn't the creator of the devices being punished
Bosch has not been charged with any wrongdoing.
Based on the analysis above, Bosch has concealed and used "defeat device" software without any notice.
How this will ultimately affect the automaking industry moving forward as the world moves toward a more green and sustainable outlook
Will we need to look for more cleverly hidden defeat devices?
Will consumers lose goodwill with the automaking industry
Why the explicit line of the Clean Air Act was ignored, or what justification was there to use the devices
Section 203 (a)(3)(b) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), 42 U.S.C. Sec. 7522(a)(3)(b), prohibits the manufacture, selling, or installation of any device that intentionally circumvents EPA emission standards by bypassing, defeating, or rendering inoperative a required element of the vehicle's emissions control system.
Section 203 (a)(1) of the same Act also prohibits the sale of motor vehicles or engines that are not covered by valid certificates of conformity.
2. Section IV: Conclusion
Attachment:- Final Team Report.rar