How has the supreme court and current us laws interpret


Assignment:

Instructions: In a two-page double-spaced 4 paragraphs, answer the following question: How would you rephrase the Second Amendment to adapt to the current day and make it less confusing? Be sure to address the following in your assignment:

· How has the Supreme Court and current U.S Laws interpret the meaning of the Second Amendment throughout the decades.

· Is the right to bear arms belong to the individual or a group (militia)?

· How would you address the definition of current automatic weapons, specially modified weapons?

· Is it necessary to allow everyone to own a weapon or only those with necessary needs such as hunting?

Format: Two (full) pages- double spaced. 12 font Times New Roman.

Constitution of United States of America 1789 (rev. 1992)

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Solution Preview :

Prepared by a verified Expert
Business Law and Ethics: How has the supreme court and current us laws interpret
Reference No:- TGS03148969

Now Priced at $40 (50% Discount)

Recommended (97%)

Rated (4.9/5)