Assignment task: Imagine that if you would have the option to genetically enhance the fetus who might become your child, would you do it? If so, what would you consider morally acceptable to modify? Would you feel different if you were a health care provider/ a policy maker about genetic enhancement who wouldn't have children/whose children wouldn't be affected? Raise issues regarding standards of normalcy, the « right to an open future » argument, the distinction between biological and social conception of health (and disability). Use arguments from any of the authors we covered as you see fit, or from any other author whose points you might find relevant to this specific question. Consider arguments on both sides - even if your opinion leans more towards one of the 2 standpoints. (Define the terms you use carefully. Offer a clear and structured argumentation, with sentences or words you deem essential put in bold.).
Can I get a thousand word essay explanation.