Problem:
Topic: Miranda v. Arizona (1966), and Jenkins v. United States (1962) Using Psychological Evaluations for the Courts by Melton et al. (2018), how did forensic psychologists change the expectations for courtroom testimony? Answer all in one paragraphs. Using APA styles, citations, and references. Miranda and Jenkins also helped pave the way for later admissibility standards like Daubert, which require experts to base their opinions on reliable scientific methods. Do you see these earlier cases as helping establish the foundation for psychological testimony to be judged by empirical standards? Need Assignment Help?