How does strongs distinction between things and devices


In "Technological Subversion", David Strong questions "the good life" that modern technology seems to afford us. What point is Strong making here, and what is your assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of his position? How does Strong's distinction between "things" and "devices" serve to support or detract from his claims?

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Business Law and Ethics: How does strongs distinction between things and devices
Reference No:- TGS01067163

Expected delivery within 24 Hours