How do you understand stare decisis


Problem

Consider the doctrine of stare decisis. How do you understand it? Should courts follow past rulings, or should they decide cases anew each time, without regard to past decisions? For example, should Texas v. Johnson stand because it is precedent, or should the justices take a "fresh look" at the issue of flag burning?

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Macroeconomics: How do you understand stare decisis
Reference No:- TGS03302734

Expected delivery within 24 Hours