How do their findings compare with literature in the field


Part 1: summary of the paper. Why did the authors do the work?

What was/were their hypothesis(es)

How did they test their hypthesis(ie).

What was their expt. design?

Analyses... stats used?

What techniques?

What did they find?

Part 2: Critique: How do their findings compare with literature in the field?

Was their exptl design/stats appropriate?

Are their interpretations sound? etc.

Article: - Generation of Functional Neuromuscular Junctions from Human Pluripotent Stem Cell Lines

Katja A. Puttonen, Marika Ruponen, Nikolay Naumenko, Outi H. Hovatta, Pasi Tavi and Jari Koistinaho

Solution Preview :

Prepared by a verified Expert
Biology: How do their findings compare with literature in the field
Reference No:- TGS01287291

Now Priced at $20 (50% Discount)

Recommended (99%)

Rated (4.3/5)