How do folk et al suggest that event relevance for attention


Assignment

- How do Folk et al. (1992) suggest that event relevance for attentional selection is determined?

- What exactly do they mean with contingent involuntary orienting of attention?

- What is their experimental hypothesis?

- What is the alternative hypothesis?

- How did they test their hypothesis (e.g., how do the stimuli look like, what is the task of the participants, what are their dependent and independent variables)?

- What are their result predictions if their hypothesis is correct?

- What are their result predictions if the alternative hypothesis is correct?

- What do they find?

- What does this mean? How do they interpret their results?

1. The aim of the study.
2. Were the methods and procedures used appropriate for meeting these aims.
3. Main findings.
4. Conclusions.

Article: Involuntary Coverting Is Contingent on Attentional Control Settings by Charles L. Folk, Roger W. Remington and James C. Johnston.

Solution Preview :

Prepared by a verified Expert
Other Subject: How do folk et al suggest that event relevance for attention
Reference No:- TGS02952630

Now Priced at $35 (50% Discount)

Recommended (98%)

Rated (4.3/5)