Part One:
Is there any reason to prefer one ethical theory above the rest? What are the best objections to each of the theories, and how could an advocate of the theories defend them from the objections? Identify common ground on which moral decision-making can proceed. In your responnse consider the subtleties of Kan't main formulations of the categorical imperitive including his emphasis on moral motivation and respect for persons.
Your response should be a minimum of 100 words to make it easier for this part use only the slides attached.
Part Two: journal
Please read the Case Study #2.1, "Hacking into Harvard" on page 83 of your text. Discuss several of the social and psychological factors that can effect moral decision making in this case. In your response discern between ethical egoism and psychological egoism as well as between utilitarianism and Kantianism.
(minimum 200 words)