If you do this as an Issue Essay, tackle an issue directly and you can still refer to cases in passing.
Is investment just another form of gambling, and if so does that make it morally unjustified? Handle a case of investment whose moral
legitimacy might be questioned, and apply the case study format to it to seek a solution. It may be a case of insider trading, day trading, selling short, investment in futures, mechanized trading, etc.
How can it be argued that any of this is productive? Or, in the case of insider trading, how can it be argued that it is wrong? How can we expect anyone to follow a law against insider trading when they have the information anyway, owing to their position in the organization.
Another controversial case is the teaming up of investment minds with political insiders. Is this not another kind of de facto insider trading?
What if the sources of knowledge are through informal friendships?
Below is a Skelly-analysis of investment according to purpose, with related questions.
As categorized by intention, there are three different types of investment. They can overlap one another in the same actions.
1. Private Investment - a party's lending resources to or buying ownership in enterprises for the sake of that party's own enrichment.
2. Entrepreneurial Investment - A party's lending or giving resources to enterprises for the sake of the success of that enterprise.
3. Social Investment - A party's lending or giving resources to, or buying ownership in, enterprises for the sake of the improvement of society.
Sample argument:
1. A prosperous society depends on the goals of Investment of types 2 and 3 being met.
2. The strategy of pursuing Private investment alone is bound to fail to meet the purposes of social and entrepreneurial investment.
3. Any investment strategy that fails to meet the purposes required for a society to be prosperous is wrong.
C. The investment strategy of pursuing private investment alone is
Attachment:- document_0.rar