Google should have higher return than linkedin because its


Google is a big stock and LinkedIN is a small stock, but at the same time Google has a higher book-to-market ratio than LindedIN. According to the size effect, Google should have lower return than LinkedIN because its size is bigger; but according to the value effect, Google should have higher return than LinkedIN because its book to market ratio is higher. Is the above statement correct? Why?

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Financial Management: Google should have higher return than linkedin because its
Reference No:- TGS02826087

Expected delivery within 24 Hours