Problem
I. Given the health risks associated with meat consumption that are reported in the introduction of the Amiot et al. (2018) article, do you think this activity should be labeled a health-compromising behavior? Why or why not?
II. Results from the Steele et al. (2020) meta-analysis indicated that MI can be effective in changing behaviors associated with one substance, but that this intervention was ineffective for the other substance they looked at. Given what you know about the intervention (and perhaps each of these substances as well), why do you think that was the case?
III. One limitation Kaholokula and colleagues (2021) discussed was a gender imbalance in the participants they were able to recruit for the study. Based on their hypothesized reasoning for this imbalance (and your own ideas), what do you think could be some solutions to this issue that future interventions could attempt?