Give an example of a government created monopoly. Is creating this monopoly necessarily bad public policy?
Explain two soft drinks sit side-by-side in a grocery store: A six-pack of Coca-Cola (a brand name) sells for $3.00, while a six-pack of Uncle Don's cola (not a brand name) sells for $1.50. In a typical day the store sells some of each type of cola, which suggests that two soft drinks sit side-by-side in a grocery store: A six-pack of Coca-Cola (a brand name) sells for $3.00, while a six-pack of Uncle Don's cola (not a brand name) sells for $1.50.
In a typical day the store sells some of each type of cola, which suggests that Major League Baseball (MLB) has adopted FOA because it fears that regular binding arbitration is addictive. In what way can binding arbitration be addictive?